What is Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis?
Why Are Visual Endpoints Relevant in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Research?
What Are Common Animal Models For Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis?
- MOG35-55 EAE (C57BL/6 mouse): The most widely replicated EAE variant. Subcutaneous immunisation with MOG peptide 35-55 emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) with pertussis toxin co-injection produces ascending paralysis peaking around day 14-21 post-immunisation, with spinal cord and optic nerve demyelination. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity decline is detectable by OptoDrum from peak motor disease through the chronic phase, reflecting optic nerve demyelination and progressive RGC loss. The monophasic course in C57BL/6 mice supports clean single-episode intervention studies. (Capper et al., 2025)(Morin et al., 2021)
- B cell-dependent EAE with anti-MOG antibody responses (C57BL/6 or humanised variants): Immunisation protocols incorporating anti-MOG antibodies or B cell- stimulating adjuvants produce a humoral immune component alongside T cell-driven inflammation, more closely recapitulating MOGAD pathology. Complement-mediated demyelination and a distinct optic neuritis profile distinguish this variant from canonical T cell-driven EAE, and OptoDrum captures the corresponding differences in functional visual trajectory. (Joly et al., 2022)
- MOGAD and NMOSD models (MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG passive transfer): Passive transfer of human MOG-IgG or AQP4-IgG into rodents with an adjuvant optic nerve inflammatory trigger produces a severe, rapidly evolving optic neuritis that is distinct from EAE in its severity and the poor visual recovery that follows. OptoDrum has been used to document the functional visual phenotype of these disease-specific variants, establishing a benchmark against which disease-modifying therapies for NMOSD and MOGAD can be tested. (Remlinger et al., 2023)(Remlinger et al., 2022)
- Conditional immune gene knockout EAE (C57BL/6; histamine signalling knockouts): Cell-specific conditional deletion of histidine decarboxylase (Hdc) in different immune compartments creates mechanistically refined EAE variants for dissecting the role of specific immune mediators. OptoDrum quantifies the functional visual consequences of these genetic immunological manipulations with sufficient sensitivity to detect between-genotype differences in visual outcome. (Morin et al., 2021)
- Dietary and environmental modulation of MOG35-55 EAE (C57BL/6): High-saturated, long-chain fatty acid dietary regimens exacerbate EAE severity and visual pathway damage without altering the induction protocol. This variant demonstrates that environmental variables measurably shift OptoDrum-quantifiable visual outcomes, making it particularly relevant for studies examining diet-microbiome-neuroinflammation interactions in MS-relevant models. (Capper et al., 2025)
How Can Striatech Tools support Your Study?
01Which EAE Variant Best Models MS vs NMOSD vs MOGAD, and How Does the Visual Phenotype Differ?Audience A - Vision-focusedAudience B - CNS/Systemic
Quick Answer
MOG35-55/C57BL/6 EAE models T cell-driven MS with a monophasic visual acuity decline that partially recovers in some animals; PLP139-151/ SJL/J EAE produces relapsing-remitting optic neuritis best captured by longitudinal OptoDrum tracking; B cell-dependent and MOG-IgG/AQP4-IgG passive transfer models produce the more severe, less remitting optic neuritis of MOGAD/NMOSD, with an OptoDrum functional profile that is diagnostically distinguishable from T cell-driven EAE.
The challenge
MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD are distinct diseases with different pathological substrates, clinical courses, and treatment responses. Preclinical researchers need to select the EAE variant that best recapitulates the disease mechanism under investigation – T cell-mediated demyelination, astrocytopathy driven by AQP4-IgG, or complement-mediated axon attack driven by MOG-IgG – and then confirm that the chosen variant produces the expected visual phenotype. Mismatched model selection is a leading cause of failed translational predictions.
Classical motor scoring (Expanded Disability Status Scale analogues) does not disambiguate between these variants because all produce ascending paralysis. The visual pathway provides a complementary readout that more directly reflects optic nerve involvement, which varies markedly between variants. AQP4-IgG NMOSD models, for example, produce catastrophic optic nerve destruction with near-total OMR loss and minimal recovery, whereas T cell-driven EAE produces a partial, fluctuating deficit. Capturing this distinction non-invasively and longitudinally requires an endpoint that is repeatable across weeks without sacrifice.
For the broader clinical context of these disease entities, see Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Demyelinating Diseases. For the optic nerve structural correlates of these visual deficits, see Axon Degeneration.
How Striatech products help
Measures spatial visual acuity (cycles per degree) and contrast sensitivity via the subcortical optomotor reflex in awake, unrestrained mice. In EAE variant comparison studies, it provides the functional visual phenotype – onset timing, nadir severity, recovery trajectory – that distinguishes T cell-driven, B cell-driven, and antibody-mediated disease variants without sacrifice.
Measures visual acuity via an operant paradigm requiring cortical visual processing. Useful for assessing cortical visual pathway involvement in EAE variants where suprathreshold or higher-order visual function is of interest, complementing the retina-to-brainstem endpoint measured by OptoDrum.
Provides restraint-free animal placement, reducing handling stress during OMR testing. Particularly relevant for EAE animals at peak disease where conventional restraint would be inappropriate for debilitated animals with motor deficits.
Evidence from the Literature
Developed and characterised rodent models for NMOSD and MOGAD using OptoDrum to document the distinct pattern of visual pathway dysfunction produced by AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG-mediated attack. The functional visual profile was demonstrably different from classical T cell-driven EAE, establishing OptoDrum as the discriminating endpoint between autoimmune demyelinating disease models.
Characterised a B cell-dependent EAE variant in which MOG antibody responses drive demyelination alongside T cell-mediated inflammation. OptoDrum documented the functional visual consequence of this antibody-mediated optic nerve attack, providing evidence that the B cell/MOG-IgG arm of EAE produces a visual dysfunction profile distinct from canonical CD4+ T cell-driven disease.
02When Do EAE Visual Deficits Emerge Relative to Motor Scoring, and Can OMR Testing Precede or Supplement the Clinical EAE Score?Audience A - Vision-focusedAudience B - CNS/Systemic
Quick Answer
In MOG35-55 C57BL/6 EAE, optomotor acuity and contrast sensitivity decline is detectable at or around the onset of motor symptoms, and persists through the chronic phase even after partial motor recovery. Repeated non-invasive OMR testing with OptoDrum can run in parallel with daily motor scoring in the same animals, adding a continuous visual function dimension to the standard EAE clinical timeline without additional cohorts or surgical intervention.
The challenge
The standard EAE clinical score (0-5 ascending paralysis scale) captures motor output but provides no information about cranial nerve involvement, optic neuritis severity, or the functional status of the retino-brainstem visual pathway. Motor score and visual function are partially dissociated: an animal scoring 2-3 on the motor scale may have near-normal vision or severe optic neuritis depending on the optic nerve involvement in that individual, which varies even within inbred strains.
Researchers optimising treatment windows need to know whether visual deficits precede, coincide with, or lag behind motor symptom onset. If visual deficits emerge early – potentially reflecting subclinical optic nerve inflammation before motor paralysis – OMR testing could serve as an early warning endpoint. If they persist after motor recovery, they capture the residual neurological damage most relevant to chronic disease staging. Both dynamics have direct translational relevance to clinical VEP prolongation in MS.
Conventionally, characterising the visual phenotype required ERG or histological RGC counts, both of which are terminal or require anaesthesia and provide only a single time point per animal. Repeated longitudinal visual function testing in the same EAE cohort, without anaesthesia or surgery, was not practically achievable before automated OMR platforms.
For the neuroinflammatory cellular mechanisms driving this visual pathway damage, see Neuroinflammation.
How Striatech products help
Measures visual acuity (cycles per degree) and contrast sensitivity via the optomotor reflex in awake, freely moving mice. Tests can be run in minutes without anaesthesia or training, enabling weekly or bi-weekly assessments across the full EAE time course – before immunisation (baseline), at onset, at peak, during partial recovery, and in the chronic phase. Temporal pairing of OMR and motor score in the same animal enables within-animal correlations between CNS visual and motor outcomes.
Provides controlled dark adaptation for scotopic OMR testing with the ScotopicKit extension. In EAE studies incorporating night-vision or rod pathway endpoints, DarkAdapt ensures consistent pre-adaptation conditions across all animals and time points.
Eliminates restraint-induced stress during OMR testing, which is critical for EAE animals at peak disease where handling stress confounds motor and potentially autonomic readouts. Also appropriate for aged-onset EAE or progressive disease models where animals are chronically debilitated.
Evidence from the Literature
Demonstrated that dietary fat composition measurably shifts visual function outcomes in EAE, with OptoDrum detecting between-group differences in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity at multiple time points across the disease course. The study validates OptoDrum sensitivity to environmental modulators of EAE severity, confirming that even moderate disease-course changes are captured functionally.
Used conditional Hdc knockouts to demonstrate that histaminergic immune modulation alters EAE severity and visual pathway functional outcomes. OptoDrum measured the functional visual consequences of these cell-specific immune manipulations, establishing that neuroimmune mediator changes produce OMR-detectable differences in visual function.
03B Cell vs T Cell EAE: What Are the Distinct Immunological Mechanisms and Visual Signatures?Audience A - Vision-focusedAudience B - CNS/Systemic
Quick Answer
Classical MOG35-55 EAE is driven by CD4+ T helper 17 and T helper 1 cells that orchestrate demyelination via microglia and macrophage activation. B cell-dependent EAE additionally incorporates MOG-specific antibodies that engage complement- mediated lysis of myelin and oligodendrocytes, producing a distinct optic neuritis profile with potentially greater axon loss and a visual dysfunction trajectory that OptoDrum can differentiate from the T cell-only model. This distinction is critical for benchmarking B cell-targeting therapies such as anti-CD20 agents.
The challenge
MS treatment has been transformed by anti-CD20 therapies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab) that deplete B cells, reducing relapse rates in both relapsing-remitting and primary progressive MS. Yet the standard EAE model used in most preclinical laboratories is a T cell-driven model that lacks the humoral immune component. Preclinical evaluation of B cell-targeted therapies in a B cell- dependent EAE model with a validated visual endpoint would provide a more mechanistically faithful translational platform.
B cells contribute to MS and MOGAD pathology through several non-redundant mechanisms: as antigen-presenting cells that license autoreactive T cells, as producers of MOG-specific and AQP4- specific antibodies that engage complement at the node of Ranvier and at astrocytic endfeet, and as sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IL-6) that amplify local inflammation. Each mechanism has a different downstream effect on the optic nerve and retina, and the functional visual trajectory differs accordingly. Without a validated functional endpoint, researchers cannot determine whether a B cell-targeting intervention is reducing the T cell licensing arm, the antibody-mediated arm, or both.
For the optic nerve structural consequences of antibody-mediated demyelination, see Optic Nerve Damage. For the specific retinal cell-type outcomes, see Retinal Ganglion Cell Pathology. For the clinical disease context, see Optic Neuritis.
How Striatech products help
Provides the functional visual endpoint for comparing B cell-dependent and T cell-driven EAE variants in the same experiment or across cohorts. The OMR captures the integrated output of the optic nerve-retina axis; a more severe or sustained OMR deficit in the B cell/antibody model compared to the T cell model provides functional evidence that humoral mechanisms add a distinct layer of visual pathway damage beyond T cell-driven demyelination alone.
Measures cortical visual acuity via operant testing. Where B cell-dependent EAE produces more severe optic nerve damage with associated visual cortex reorganisation, AcuiSee can provide the cortical-level complement to OptoDrum’s subcortical OMR measurement.
Evidence from the Literature
Characterised a B cell-dependent EAE model incorporating MOG-specific antibody responses. OptoDrum measured visual acuity and contrast sensitivity to document that B cell/antibody-driven EAE produces optic neuritis and RGC death with a functional visual profile distinguishable from classical CD4+ T cell-driven disease. The study establishes a functional visual benchmark for evaluating B cell-targeted therapies – including anti-CD20 monoclonals – in this model.
04Disease-Modifying Therapy Benchmarking in EAE Using Visual Endpoints: What Can OptoDrum Detect?Audience A - Vision-focused
Quick Answer
OptoDrum provides a sensitive, non-invasive functional endpoint for benchmarking disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in EAE, including neuroprotective agents (HIF-1 inhibitors), antibody-clearing therapies (FcRn blockade), and immunomodulatory compounds. Published studies demonstrate that pharmacological interventions that preserve optic nerve integrity produce statistically discriminable improvements in OptoDrum-measured visual acuity and contrast sensitivity relative to vehicle-treated controls.
The challenge
Motor scoring is the standard readout for EAE therapy studies, but it has well-documented limitations as a translational endpoint: it is categorical, subject to inter-rater variability, and does not map cleanly onto the patient-relevant outcomes used in MS clinical trials (such as relapse rate, VEP latency, optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, or Expanded Disability Status Scale). The visual pathway provides a set of endpoints – functional acuity, contrast sensitivity, optic nerve conduction – that more directly parallel the clinical outcome measures used in MS trials, strengthening the translational argument for preclinical efficacy data.
Beyond the translational alignment argument, visual endpoints offer a practical advantage: they are continuously measurable in the same animals used for motor scoring, without adding cohorts or terminal procedures. This allows researchers to establish an intervention’s functional efficacy profile across the full treatment window – whether a compound prevents the initial deficit, promotes recovery during remission, or slows progression in the chronic phase – rather than capturing only a single post-treatment time point at sacrifice.
For therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring visual function after EAE-related optic nerve damage, see Retinal Ganglion Cell Pathology for neuroprotective rescue strategies.
How Striatech products help
Measures visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as the primary functional readout for DMT efficacy in EAE. Because the OMR is non-invasive and rapid (3-5 minutes per animal), it can be run at every time point planned for motor scoring, yielding a continuous functional visual curve against which the treatment effect can be quantified. Treatment-preserved visual acuity provides a functional correlate of optic nerve integrity that complements histological RGC counts and is directly analogous to clinical VEP measurements.
Assesses cortical visual acuity via operant visual discrimination. For DMT studies where suprathreshold visual processing or cortical visual pathway outcomes are of interest – particularly relevant for MS models where cortical grey matter lesions contribute to cognitive and visual impairment – AcuiSee provides the cortical complement to OptoDrum’s subcortical OMR endpoint.
Minimises handling stress during repeated OMR testing in treated EAE cohorts, particularly important for chronically treated animals where stress-corticosteroid interactions could confound immunological outcomes and visual function measurements.
Evidence from the Literature
Demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of HIF-1 (hypoxia-inducible factor 1) with acriflavine preserves visual function in EAE by reducing optic nerve hypoxia-driven neuroinflammation. OptoDrum provided the primary functional efficacy endpoint, confirming that HIF-1 inhibition translates to retained optomotor visual acuity and reduced optic neuritis severity. This study represents a mechanistically novel DMT approach – targeting the metabolic-inflammatory interface rather than conventional immune cell depletion – validated with a visual function endpoint.
Evaluated FcRn receptor blockade as a strategy to reduce circulating MOG antibody titres and attenuate EAE/MOGAD-related optic neuritis. FcRn blockade is a clinically advanced therapeutic strategy already in use for other antibody-driven diseases (myasthenia gravis, NMOSD). OptoDrum measured visual acuity as the functional confirmation that antibody reduction via FcRn blockade translates to preserved visual pathway integrity.
05Chronic Progressive vs Relapsing EAE: How Do OMR Longitudinal Trajectories Differ, and What Does This Mean for Endpoint Planning?Audience A - Vision-focusedAudience B - CNS/Systemic
Quick Answer
Relapsing EAE variants (PLP139-151/SJL/J) produce episodic optomotor acuity loss aligned with relapses, with partial inter-episode recovery; chronic progressive variants (MOG35-55/C57BL/6 in aged or persistently immunised settings, or NMOSD passive transfer models) produce a sustained, non-recovering OMR deficit. Distinguishing these trajectories with OptoDrum enables researchers to set appropriate sampling intervals, power calculations, and intervention timing for each disease model type.
The challenge
Endpoint planning for EAE therapy studies requires knowledge of the expected visual function trajectory for the chosen model variant. A compound evaluated in a relapsing model must be sampled frequently enough to capture peak deficit during relapses and partial recovery between attacks; a compound evaluated in a chronic progressive model must be sampled over a long enough window to detect rate-of-decline differences between treatment groups. Using the wrong sampling frequency or study duration for the disease course produces underpowered studies with inconclusive functional endpoints.
The relapsing-remitting vs chronic progressive distinction also maps differently onto clinical endpoints. Relapsing EAE visual function data most directly parallels the episodic VEP changes seen during MS clinical relapses, while chronic progressive EAE OMR trajectories better model the progressive retinal nerve fibre layer thinning and sustained VEP latency prolongation seen in secondary progressive MS and NMOSD. Aligning the preclinical endpoint strategy with the clinical measurement precedent strengthens the translational argument for regulatory submissions.
Neuroinflammatory cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the distinct progressive vs relapsing trajectories are addressed in Neuroinflammation. For the optic nerve structural correlates of progressive vs acute visual loss, see Optic Nerve Damage.
How Striatech products help
Enables weekly or bi-weekly non-invasive OMR assessments across the full EAE study duration. In relapsing models, this captures the full relapse-remission visual cycle in the same animals; in chronic progressive models, it provides a continuous visual decline curve against which treatment-induced rate-of-decline differences can be detected. The non-invasive format means sampling density is limited only by study design, not by animal welfare constraints.
Enables scotopic OMR testing (with the ScotopicKit extension) to assess rod-pathway visual function as a complement to photopic acuity measurements. In EAE models with outer retinal involvement or studies incorporating circadian rhythm analysis, controlled dark adaptation via DarkAdapt ensures reproducible scotopic baseline conditions.
Particularly important for chronic studies and aged EAE animals where stress responses may differ across disease stages. Restraint-free testing maintains consistent test conditions across the longitudinal study, reducing stress-related variability in repeated-measures designs.
Evidence from the Literature
The full set of six publications establishes the longitudinal optomotor endpoint profile, measured with OptoDrum, across multiple EAE variants.
Longitudinal OMR data (using OptoDrum) in MOG35-55/C57BL/6 EAE is provided under different modulating conditions (dietary and immunological), establishing the expected deficit trajectory and its sensitivity to between-group differences.
Documents the more severe and persistent OMR trajectory (measured with OptoDrum) of NMOSD/MOGAD passive transfer variants, providing the comparative benchmark for chronic non-remitting disease modelling.
Summary: Striatech Products supporting your research questions
| Research Question | OptoDrum | ScotopicKit | AcuiSee | Photorefractor | Keratometer | DarkAdapt | Non-aversive platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variant selection (MS vs NMOSD vs MOGAD) | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Visual onset timing vs motor score | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| B cell vs T cell mechanisms | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| DMT benchmarking | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Longitudinal trajectories | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Measuring Functional Visual Outcomes in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis: How Do Available Methods Compare?
| Modality | Invasiveness | Repeatable longitudinally | Training required | Automation | Endpoint type | Translational analogue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OptoDrum (OMR) | None | Yes – weekly or more frequent | None | Fully automated | Subcortical functional acuity and contrast sensitivity | VEP acuity component; psychophysical optotype acuity |
| AcuiSee (operant) | None | Yes | Operant shaping (days to weeks) | Automated reward delivery | Cortical visual acuity | Clinical optotype visual acuity (ETDRS) |
| VEP (flash or pattern) | Requires anaesthesia or chronic electrode implant | Limited by anaesthesia / electrode welfare | Moderate (electrode preparation) | Semi-automated | Cortical evoked potential; latency and amplitude | Clinical VEP (direct equivalent) |
| ERG | Requires anaesthesia | Limited by anaesthesia | Moderate | Semi-automated | Retinal photoreceptor and inner nuclear layer function | Clinical full-field ERG |
| RGC histology / OCT | Terminal (histology); non-invasive (OCT) | OCT: yes; histology: no | High (histology); moderate (OCT) | Semi-automated (OCT) | Structural cell count / layer thickness | Clinical OCT retinal nerve fibre layer |
| Motor EAE score | None (observation) | Yes – daily | None | Not automated (observer-rated) | Motor disability | EDSS (partial analogue) |
Publications on Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Journal Clubs related to Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Journal Club: In Vivo Modeling of Immune-mediated Optic Neuropathies
- Related Products:
- OptoDrum
Journal Club: Anti-FcRn Treatment in Antibody-Associated Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
- Related Products:
- OptoDrum
Related application areas, neighbouring research chapters, and the questions researchers ask most.
Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
The principal rodent paradigm for multiple sclerosis. Model variants (MOG, PLP, B-cell-dependent, passive transfer) differ in disease course and visual phenotype, with optic neuritis as a near-universal feature.